|
Even
among a subgroup of those who abstained from sex until
at least age 20, four-fifths had had premarital sex
by age 44, the study found.
Finer
said the likelihood of Americans having sex before marriage
has remained stable since the 1950s, though people now
wait longer to get married and thus are sexually active
as singles for extensive periods.
The
study found women virtually as likely as men to engage
in premarital sex, even those born decades ago. Among
women born between 1950 and 1978, at least 91 percent
had had premarital sex by age 30, he said, while among
those born in the 1940s, 88 percent had done so by age
44.
"The
data clearly show that the majority of older teens and
adults have already had sex before marriage, which calls
into question the federal government's funding of abstinence-only-until-marriage
programs for 12- to 29-year-olds," Finer said.
Under
the Bush administration, such programs have received
hundreds of millions of dollars in federal funding.
"It
would be more effective," Finer said, "to
provide young people with the skills and information
they need to be safe once they become sexually active
- which nearly everyone eventually will."
Wade
Horn, assistant secretary for children and families
at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services,
defended the abstinence-only approach for teenagers.
"One
of its values is to help young people delay the onset
of sexual activity," he said. "The longer
one delays, the fewer lifetime sex partners they have,
and the less the risk of contracting a sexually transmitted
disease."
He
insisted there was no federal mission against premarital
sex among adults.
"Absolutely
not," Horn said. "The Bush administration
does not believe the government should be regulating
or stigmatizing the behavior of adults."
Horn
said he found the high percentages of premarital sex
cited in the study to be plausible, and expressed hope
that society would not look askance at the small minority
that chooses to remain abstinent before marriage.
However,
Janice Crouse of Concerned Women for America, a conservative
group which strongly supports abstinence-only education,
said she was skeptical of the findings.
"Any
time I see numbers that high, I'm a little suspicious,"
she said. "The numbers are too pat."
Leslee
Unruh, who runs a South Dakota-based organization promoting
abstinence-only education, contended that increasing
numbers of young people were open to remaining chaste
until marriage.
|